The Hallicrafters S-120 Radio Project
How I finally got my birthday present to work the way I always wanted it to after 50 years.
A comprehensive story containing historical, educational, technical and biographical elements & opinions
How I got my S-120
I was given this radio for my 16th birthday in December of 1961 because I was always talking about shortwave radios and my parents wanted to give me something nice. These radios were considered "inexpensive general coverage receivers," however since they were hand built and hand wired, they cost a lot of money, about $70 in 1960 dollars or about $400 in today's money. They were fine for short wave broadcast and AM radio listening, but they were pretty useless as Amateur band radios because of their lack of selectivity and stability and, most importantly, they had a very poor beat frequency oscillator (BFO). They also used a simple diode detector rather than a more complicated and effective product detector for producing audio. I'm sure my folks thought they were buying me a "ham radio" and were probably told that by the salesman who sold it to them.
When I first received this radio, I was pleased with it, but it was no ham radio. I soon discovered that it really wasn't up to the crowded conditions on the ham bands and the BFO made listening to Morse Code (AKA, Continuous Wave, AKA, CW) nearly impossible. Trying to listen to Single Side Band (SSB) ham radio broadcasts with that BFO was definitely impossible. Still, I was thrilled to be able to hear all the international short wave broadcasts and with its help, I learned something about the wide world outside my isolated little town.
My old S-120 as it looks today which is about the same as it looked in 1960.
When I first got my S-120, Radio Havana was one of the first stations I tuned in to because it was on every day and it came in loud and clear and it was in English. Castro's Cuban Revolution had just occurred and I listened with shock and anger as Radio Havana broadcasted what I thought was needlessly hostile and hateful anti-American propaganda. I have since come to realize that much of what was broadcast by Radio Havana was simply the truth regarding our dirty dealings down there starting in 1898 when we took Cuba from the Spanish and then made it a haven for our organized crime bosses. Why hell, we still "own" a beautiful bay right on their own soil where the worst kinds of violations of our own Constitution are practiced on people who don't even have the right to a trial. I've got more to say on this in a little rant at the very end of this article if you are so interested.
Getting my S-120 to work the way I wanted itAfter high school I sort of let my interest in short wave radio wain and I stopped using the radio. Earlier I had grown increasingly dissatisfied with my S-120 because the upper band (band 4) never did work, audio amplifier tubes kept overheating and burning out and the radio's very unstable Beat Frequency Oscillator (BFO) operation irritated me. A lot of water went under the bridge and a lot of things happened in my life for good and bad, and for about 40 years, right up until last year, the radio sat around my house gathering dust and serving strictly as a piece of decoration. Still, I knew that "someday" I'd really fix the radio up and listen to it once again. Probably the biggest reason I waited so long before taking it on as a project was because I had no schematic to work to. The Internet changed all that and now schematics are available for nearly every radio ever made.
The Hallicrafters S-120 schematic after a clean-up and showing the addition of a "real" BFO.
Drop me an E-mail if you would like a higher resolution version of this schematic.
A few months ago I downloaded the original schematic and then went to work on it so that I'd have something readable to work to and to record the modifications I wanted to make. The result is the schematic shown above. I cleaned it up with the Paint program and with the help of this schematic, I finally began working on the old radio. I replaced the electrolytic capacitors, of course, but all the rest of the capacitors and resistors were of a modern type and I left them in except for one very important capacitor.* I was especially pleased to discovered that a leaky coupling capacitor between the first audio amplifier and the output amplifier was the reason the amplifier tubes used to overheated and burn out. The leaky capacitor put a positive bias on the grid and caused too much current to flow in the tube, thus overheating it. The upper band problem that had disappointed me as a kid was fixed when I found a bad connection on the band selector wafer switch and fixed it.
* Since writing that, I have discovered that the capacitors in the S-120 are not modern types after all. They look modern because they have a plastic shell on them, but are really the old fashioned paper-foil types that can cause future trouble. As of now, I am of the opinion that ALL the capacitors except C21, C22, C23, C14 and C17 should be replaced with modern capacitors. In some radios, C14, C17, C18, R12 and R13 are all molded together in a block called a "couplate." Lately I've helped people with their radios and many times their problems resided in their couplate. If you have one in your radio, get rid of it immediately and replace it with discrete components. Couplates are a cheap device that were made to save a buck or two, but they are complete junk and a source of real trouble.
Finally, I solved the awful BFO problem by building and installing a "real" BFO oscillator that works beautifully, really beautifully and having it is a huge, huge improvement over the otherwise useless BFO my radio used to have. In the diagram, note the tiny Field Effect Transistor (FET) BFO circuit in the center of the schematic and below the 12BA6 tube. I built the new BFO circuit using a MFP-102 field effect transistor and a coil I wound on a small toroidal form with all the parts mounted on a tiny terminal strip. The BFO is powered by +6 volts from the audio output tube's cathode biasing resistor. The BFO's output is very lightly coupled to the grid (pin 1) of the 12BA6 IF tube by simply having the wire from the BFO next to the wire going to the grid (too much coupling will swamp the IF tube). The BFO circuit draws just a few microamps so it has no effect on the bias of the audio output tube. This is the same BFO design I used in the S-38b radio and it works as well here as it does in that radio.
For a more detailed explanation of how these little BFO's work with the simple AM diode detectors found in these radios, please read the BFO section of my EC-1 page.
By the way, Here is a useful tip from my EC-1b page:
One really great way to find broadcast stations on the shortwave bands is to turn on the BFO and listen for loud "whistles" as you tune up and down the dial with the main tuning control. When you hear a whistle, tune as close to "zero beat" as possible and then turn off the BFO. Trim up the signal with the bandspread control and you have a nicely tuned in shortwave station to listen to. For me, this is probably the most useful thing a BFO does.
Here's a closeup of the IF stage showing the new BFO in more detail.
Note that R6 is used simply as an on/off switch and should be either fully clockwise (on) or fully counterclockwise (off).
Here is what the module looks like soldered to the back side of the chassis.
See how simple it is and how easily it fits into the radio? These things can
also be made on small chips of perf-board and mounted with lugs.
As with my other radio projects, I wanted to make sure this was a safe radio and that I wouldn't get an electrical shock from it while working on it. I studied the schematic very carefully and I saw that, unlike some of the earlier Hallicrafters radios (like the EC-1s and the S38s), the S120's chassis was already adequately safe because it was originally designed with an isolated return bus and the chassis was not connected directly to AC. Just to give it an added safety factor, I installed a polarized AC plug and connected the return bus to AC neutral. Unless you do this, you have a 50/50 chance of getting a slight shock from the radio as a small AC current may flow from the return bus through the 0.047 mF bypass capacitor and 470K Ohm resistor to the chassis. Such a shock wouldn't be dangerous, but it could startle you and maybe cause you to hurt yourself or damage the radio.
With the radio wired up this way, with the return bus at AC Neutral, unless you touch the AC side of the on/off switch or the rectifier, you can't get a shock off this radio. By the way, this radio uses the exact same "isolated return bus" scheme that I independently invented for my S38b radio before I started working on this radio --- great minds think alike, I guess -- even if it takes 50 years.
Another change I made to the radio was to bypass the original selenium high voltage rectifier with a tiny silicone diode. All I did was to simply solder the diode across the selenium's electrodes while making sure I had the polarity correct. The voltage drop and internal resistance across the silicone diode is so small, that almost no current flows through the selenium so it is effectively there just to solder parts on to. Sure, it really wasn't necessary for me to bypass the selenium rectifier since it was still working, but those things get really hot and they have a reputation for burning out creating a horrible smell and mess. Putting a silicone diode across the selenium rectifier puts more voltage across the filter capacitors and on the anodes of the tubes (since there isn't nearly as much internal resistance in a silicone diode as there is in a selenium rectifier), but this voltage is considerably below anything that would damage the tubes or exceed the ratings of the electrolytic capacitors. I like having the silicone diode in there because now I don't have to worry about the selenium part overheating and smoking up the place if it should fail.
Here's something else I did that isn't really necessary: sometimes it is really nice to have more than one receiver turned on for side-by-side comparisons of performance or if you have one radio tuned to a favorite station and another tuned to another station. You can't do this if both radios have their Local Oscillators (LOs) on at the same time because the LOs "talk" to each other and create interference. With the S-120, it is extremely easy to kill the LO by a slight wiring change. I added a single wire from the standby switch to a choke coil that is part of the LO's cathode circuit. This was very easy to do because a choke coil was already wired in and all I had to do was take it off the return bus and wire it to the standby switch. This is a very simple modification and very useful if you have more than one radio receiver turned on.
A final suggestionQuite recently I was asked about an annoying feature that is common to all S-120 radios. What I'm referring to is the annoying "jumping" that the tuning knobs do as you tune across the dial. It's hard to describe beyond saying that you feel a sudden change in torque and hear this "spronging" sound as you twist the knob. If you have an S-120, you know exactly what I'm talking about because your radio does it too.
The problem is caused by the deep valley that Hallicrafters machined into the shafts that the tuning strings are wrapped around. They did this to increase the turns ratio, slow down the movement of the tuning caps and make it easier to tune in stations on shortwave. The distance of travel as the string wraps within these valleys is very limited so when the wrap come to the end and up against the steep slope of the valley, the whole wrap has to suddenly jump to a different part of the valley and this is not done smoothly because of all the friction between the shaft and the string. I had considered taking the shafts out and replacing them with straight shafts with no valley, but decided to try something easy first.
I took a very slippery grease that was loaded with graphite and I smeared it on the shafts and coated the tuning string with it too. I was afraid that I would make the mechanism too slippery and it wouldn't work, but it continued to work fine. The grease didn't completely eliminate the "jumping" but it brought it down to a point where I hardly notice it and it is no longer annoying. In fact, tuning across the dial is now pretty smooth and I'm quite satisfied with how it feels. My suggestion is for you to get some really good graphite grease or other lubricant that won't dry out and give this a try before going to a more drastic solution.
Some Antenna and Other TipsThis radio has a built in loopstick antenna for the AM broadcast band as do almost every other AM radio of its era. They were also designed as long range, more technical general coverage radios and as such they should have an outside wire antenna of some kind. The fact is, these radios are very "hot" if used with a wire antenna of as little as 20 feet, but for great performance (especially on the short wave bands), the best antennas are as long as you can make them. When putting up an antenna, try to go vertical as quickly and as high as you can before going horizontal to minimize noise pick up. When working at heights, please be careful. Try to keep the antenna away from noisy devices like motors and especially fluorescent lights. If you have pieces of metal that rub together in the wind, try to clamp them down otherwise they will generate noise.
You will notice on the back of your radio there are three screw lugs for the antenna system. When using an untuned long wire antenna, only the A1 lug should be used and that little jumper tab should connect A2 to the GND lug. The A2 lug should only be used with a tuned and balanced antenna system that is beyond the scope of most users. I would suggest that you not try to connect the GND or the A2 lugs to an actual ground as you may introduce some serious noise and hum that way. Anyway, the wonderful thing about these old radios is the opportunity to experiment around and find out what works best for you with what you have.
My S-120 TodayI can say with perfect truth that my old S-120 radio, this radio that I received as a gift from my long dead parents so long ago, is now a better radio than when it was new. Having the entire high frequency spectrum divided into four segments and spread way out on a long, slow tuning slide-rule dial allows this radio to easily search out and tune in shortwave stations. After a little warm-up, the frequency drift is surprisingly low for a radio of this type. Although it was never meant as a ham band radio, lately I've been listening to a lot of ham radio conversations on both SSB and CW and the truth is, when the ham bands aren't too crowded, this radio works surprisingly well as a basic ham band receiver, as simple as it is. If it would have worked this well when I was a kid, I probably would have been able to use it on the 40 and 80 meter novice bands and maybe I would have earned a ham license years before I actually did. By the way, this little radio only uses 25 to 30 watts of power, so it is unlikely to run up my electric bill. Fixed up the way it is now, this radio is very safe, runs cool and has nothing inside that can catch on fire or smoke. I wouldn't be afraid to have it on all the time and unattended in any part of my house.
A short essay on post-war shortwave listening and why it fell out of fashionFrom long before WW 2 and all during the Cold War - well into my time - every country wanted to have their viewpoint known to the rest of the world's people and shortwave was an ideal media just for that, so shortwave broadcasting experienced its golden age. From the early 1930s to the very end of the 20th Century, the shortwave bands were filled with multiple English language broadcasts from all over the world and at all times of the day and night. Yes, there were lots of stations to listen to, but not that many Americans were listening anymore.
including a lament on the sad fate of shortwave listening
(It's just my opinion and you don't have to agree with it)
After the end of World War Two and at the beginning of the Cold War, things changed with regard to shortwave listening in America and the following is the reason I believe this occurred. Please note that this is just my personal opinion and personal observation and is thus "anecdotal evidence" and has no "scientific" standing.
As a teenager in the early 60s I can remember that, in some respects, listening to shortwave broadcasts was considered somewhat "unpatriotic" by the right-wingers of the time. About the only radio company that was still making shortwave radios for the general public was the Hallicrafters company and even they had to tailor their ads to the reactionary feelings that were killing off shortwave listening --- as this ad illustrates:
In the late 1950s and early 60s I can remember that some of my classmates thought it was very strange that I would listen to shortwave on my Hallicrafters S-120 and I even heard expressions like "dupes of the Communists," "pinkos" and "fellow travelers" applied to people like me who were curious about what was happening in other parts of the world. Like, "what's the matter with you, don't you trust the Government to tell the truth and give us all the facts?" Of course, you have to go to some pretty podunk places to find people more ignorantly conservative than some of our local doofuses, but it has always been this way and it still is - god knows. If you don't believe me, just tune our local AM stations 24/7 and you will hear what I mean. The truth is, some of the international shortwave broadcasts at that time were from stations located in Russia, China and (later) Cuba and they were filled with some pretty crude Communist propaganda. Yes, they did say things that were very hurtful to those of us who wanted to believe that our government's foreign dealings were always honorable and humane and yes, I too thought Castro was a "son of a bitch" when I first heard him through my S-120 radio.
Shortwave broadcasting really lost its raison d'etre (pardon my French) with the end of the Cold War and with the end of rival world powers wanting to spread their points of view over the airwaves. The real coupe de grace (there I go again) was done to shortwave by the spread of the Internet -- even into what was once remote places in Africa and Asia -- so that now shortwave broadcasting is a superfluous, expensive, unreliable and difficult medium that almost nobody now uses. Now, even the premiere shortwave broadcaster, the BBC, no longer broadcasts its programming on shortwave.
Today much of what remains of the shortwave bands is populated by station after station of what I personally consider really disgusting "Fundamentalist Christian" broadcasts such as you hear all over AM and at the bottom of our FM dials. I am embarrassed to have to acknowledge it, but these broadcasts come from my own United States of America. Oh lord, some of the shouting and screeching and hooting these ignorant holy Joe's do on shortwave and how they twist world events to fit their crazy Apocalyptic, End of the World religion and ugly right-wing politics, you just have to hear to believe.
Certain old stations like Radio Havana, Radio China, New Zealand, Radio Japan and a few others still have excellent English language programming on a regular basis, but they are so few now. These foreign broadcasts, even the ones from countries like Cuba, which my government, after over 50 years, doesn't have the political maturity or guts to make normal relations with, stand out as "Islands of Sanity" in a sea of bizarre and crazy Fundamentalist apocalyptic conspiracy theory nuttery. Unfortunately, this is what shortwave radio is today. It's a sad remnant of a once vibrant and wonderful way of learning about the world (even with all the communist propaganda it used to contain), but, as mentioned, there still are "islands of sanity" out there and they are still fun and well worth listening to.
There, I feel better now.
An invitation to learn more about your S-120
Of course, the S-120 radio is a superheterodyne type radio, so I would like to end this story with an invitation to read my latest little essay on how the superheterodyne radio works. I have tried to present just the easy basics so that beginners can understand the concepts behind the marvelous invention made by Edwin Armstrong back in 1917. Experienced radiomen will probably find my essay somewhat silly, but I present it anyway for your entertainment and in an attempt to share my knowledge with you.
otherwise, this is
Having arrived this far, obviously you have a superior attention span and reading ability that far exceeds that of the
majority of web users. I highly value the opinion of people such as yourself, so I ask you to briefly tell me:
Did you enjoy this article or were you disappointed?
If you have any detailed comments, questions, complaints or suggestions, I would be grateful if you would please
E-mail me directly
If you like my web page, tell your friends, if you don't like my web page, tell me.
Looking for more?
If you enjoyed this article about my S-120 and want to read more regarding an earlier radio, perhaps you'd like to read about
My World War Two era EC-1
If you would like to read about how I restored a radio salvaged from a trash pile 50 years ago, perhaps you'd like to read about
The EC-1b Radio from Captain Allan Hancock's Flying Field
or maybe you would like to read about the line of Hallicrafters radios that replaced the EC-1s and preceded the S-120
My S-38b radio
I have written a little essay you might like that explains some of the principles behind
How The Armstrong Superheterodyne Radio Works
or perhaps you'd like to read a story about another old radio or an essay from
My radio article selection page
As a last resort, you can
Return to my Home Page